Analyzing Misunderstanding in Communication Essay

I. Introduction1.1 Background at that place are many things to do when students are having time together with their friends. They can share thoughts and feelings with each other or discuss homework, lessons and so forth. Topics will flow naturally when comfortable partition in the conversation fork over been reached. Those are some of evidences which show that multitude communicate with others.Communication is an exchange of ideas, knowledge, and so on between individuals by use wording in which all parties understand the language they use. Communication sure involves more than virtuoso person, which means that there are more than atomic number 53 thought involved in the communion because everyone has different backgrounds, experiences, etc. There are two positions in parley, they are as a vector and as receiver and they will take turn to these positions. All communication has two parts a sender and a receiver. The sender has a message he or she intends to transmit, a nd s/he puts it in words, which, to her/him, outgo reflect what s/he is thinking. But many things can interject to prevent the intended message from being received accurately. (Burgess, 2013).Read moreDifferent reasons why people communicateessayMisunderstandings sometimes croak in this exchange of ideas in communication. The receiver hears but he does non listen. He does not absorb the points being made. It may because the receiver does not focus on what the sender or speaker has verbalise. a hardly a(prenominal) misconceives are language-related, the source of many of the mistakings can be traced to ambiguity in the speakers utterances. Other reasons for misunderstanding include mishearing and lack of valet knowledge, namely, factors that also contribute to misunderstanding in intracultural communication., (Kaur 2011). There are some other factors which we will find that can cause misunderstanding in communication if we break apart our experiences in having communication with others.1.2 Purpose of piece of writingThe purposes of this writing area) To find out the factors cause misunderstanding in communication, especially in the conversation which will be shown by the writer in the retrospective entropy section.b) To show what students usually talk about when they are concourse with their friends.II. Retrospective DataEveryone certainly has experienced misunderstanding when get communication with others friends, relatives, teachers, etc. Misunderstanding not only occurs in communication involving different languages, cultures, etc. People communicate with other who has the same language can also experience misunderstanding in which. It happened to me, I communicated with my friends by using same language but I still have misunderstanding in the communication. Thus, in this paper, I try to analyze misunderstanding in communication that I have experienced with my friends.At that time, we were way out to play table (bridge) while talking about t he current Korean movie. Everyone already had their cards that had been dealt. There three players in this game, namely, I, Ima and Anthi. Ima Apa film korea terbaru sekarang teman-teman? (what is the latest Korean movie, guys?) I and Anthi Emergency CoupleIma Iiih mau (Can I have the simulate?)Anthi Bagus tau Maa (It is really amazing, Maa)I Iya bener dah Maa (Shes true, Maa)Ima Siapa main? (Who is the drop off?)I Yang punya angka 3 keriting sih (Who has the 3-kinky card of course play first) They both looked at me and laughed. I thought for a moment about why they laughed at me and I unless need a few minutes to understand why they did it. I Oooh.. (I see)I and Anthi Ji Hyo yang maiiin ( Ji Hyo is main character/ one of the casts)III. Analysis/DiscussionCommunication is a complex human exercise that is successful most of the time. This, however, does not mean that understanding is granted or that it is always the case. Misunderstanding is a regular non-extraordinary featur e of human fundamental interaction, whether communicatory interaction is cross-cultural or not (Dascal 1985 Brown 1995 in BOU-FRANCH, Patricia (2002)).The information is one of examples which shows that the misunderstanding could still exist even all the parties in the communication have the same culture, language and age. The misunderstanding is happened when I said Yang punya angka 3 keriting sih (Who has the 3-kinky card of course play first). I said that because I thought my friend, Ima, asked who played first or who had turn to start the game. I thought in that way because at that time I had just set my card and had ready to start playing the game and because I had the 3-kinky card. What is the importance of having the 3-kinky card? The rule of playing Jenderal using bridge card in Indonesia, particularly in Lombok, is the one who plays first is the person who has the 3-kinky card.If we analyze the data more deeply, we will find that misunderstanding in the communication happe ned because I did not focus on the conversation when Ima asked, Siapa main? (Who is the cast?. I still focus on what we were talking about at the first talk but for the next I did not. It was not caused by lack of world knowledge because we can see from the conversation that at the end I understood or recognized that I had misunderstanding then I fixed it.IV. ConclusionIn conclusion, misunderstanding is a common thing that can happen in whether communicative interaction is cross-cultural or not. Misunderstanding caused by many factors such as ambiguity in the speakers utterances, lack of world knowledge, mishearing, etc. The data shows that the other factor that can cause misunderstanding in communication is being not focus on the conversation. Besides that, the data also shows one of what students usually talk about when they are gathering with their friends is the latest movie.V. ReferencesBOU-FRANCH, Patricia (2002) Misunderstandings and Unofficial Knowledge in Institutional Disc ourse, in David Walton & Dagmar Scheu (eds) Culture and Power Ac(unofficially)knowledging Cultural Studies in Spain, Bern Peter Lang. (pp. 323-341)Burgess, Heidi. Misunderstandings. beyond Intractability. Eds. Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess. Conflict Information Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder. Posted September 2003 . sKaur, Jagdish. Intercultural Pragmatics. Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 93116, ISSN (Online) 1613-365X, ISSN (Print) 1612-295X, DOI 10.1515/IPRG.2011.004, February 2011