Searle’s Solution to the Missing Object Problem :: Searle Philosophy Philosophical Essays

Let us recollect that to play a joke on her new friend Suzy, jenny ass tells her all near her cocker spaniel. Jenny tells Suzy that her dogs fix is shot, that Sally has dogged blonde hair, and that she loves to eat table scraps. The only fuss is that Sally does not really exist but Jenny doesnt tell this to Suzy. Because of this, Suzy forms all sorts of beliefs about Jennys cocker spaniel. She believes that it is named Sally, that it has long blonde hair and loves to eat table scraps, and perhaps a hardly a(prenominal) other beliefs. She also forms desires regarding the dog she wants to meet Sally, to play fetch with her, and to steal her a doggie treat. Suzy, therefore, has many beliefs and desires regarding Sally the cocker spaniel and all of this in spite of the fact that Sally does not really exist at all. In orchestrating this prank, Jenny thought she was merely playing a unanalyzable trick on her friend. But in succeeding at this, she has brought about a significant philosophical dilemma. If Sally the cocker spaniel does not exist, and so what ar all of Suzys beliefs and desires about? This is the problem of objectless directedness. Mental states like believing and desiring ar understood to be directed at things they are knowledgeable states, and every intentional state must spend a penny an intentional object. If I have a belief that Michael Jordan is the best basketball pseud of all time, or that Bush is a good wartime President, then these are beliefs about, respectively, Michael Jordan and George Bush. If I have a desire to meet the Pope, or to have a hamburger, then these desires are directed at the Pope and a hamburger, respectively. But in Suzys case, the supposed intentional object of her beliefs and desires Sally the cocker spaniel turned out not to exist at all. So did the beliefs and desires have an intentional object at all? And if so, what was it? In addressing this problem, this makeup will explicate and argue for a solution given by John Searle in his book, Intentionality. After briefly