Realistic Theory Education

Running head : Realistic Theory of EducationA Realist Theory of EducationMACROBUTTON NoMacro [Insert shout out of Author (s ) here]MACROBUTTON NoMacro [Insert Institution information here] A Realist Theory of EducationThe preceding(a) philosopher Aristotle once said that all men by character desire to know ADDIN EN .CITE Aristotle1924886AristotleW . D RossW . D RossMetaphys ics1070 pages121924OxfordOxford University Press75 (Aristotle , 1924 . In a adept , this desire to know is constituent(prenominal) of what it fashion to be a forgiving being . Two hearty misgivings acquire number 1 , Does it issue to know and second , why does it numerate to know The answer to the first head teacher is a matter of distrust . It is simply a matter of super hot sense , so to speak . The answer to the second question however , is not merely a matter of science . It requires critical thinking . It matters to us that we know because knowing has a practical or a pragmatic valueIt is with this perspective that cardinal grosbeak may have a fuller understanding of the depicted object of benignant beings acquisition of familiarity . That to seek knowledge is constitutive of what it heart to be a human being and that knowledge has a practical or pragmatic value explains why there is a felt need to develop theories of command . This had been the main labour of Philosophy of Education . This has a two-fold task first , it seeks to explicate a realist theory of education along with it philosophic motivations and underpinnings , and second , how a realist theory of education may appropriately address significant issues in a well-favored and republican political settingAn initial disambiguation of the term naive realism is required . In philosophy , realism is a meta animal(prenominal) schoolda ys of thought . Meaning to say it is concern! ed with fundamental ontology . Its perfume stamp then is the very notion of reality itself . naive realism is the apparent horizon that reality and the objects within it such as trees and stones , etc . exists and that their founding has an independence from a mind that perceives them .

Reality exists severally of human representation , so to speak . flush toilet Searle in his retain The Construction of Social Reality distinguishes between physical and neighborly facts . As Searle contends , the ontology of physical facts is different from the ontology of social facts ADDIN EN .CITE Searle1997666John R Searle The Construction Of Social Reality256 pages1997Free Press94Engli sh (Searle , 1997 . He offers a accommodating characterization of realism when he writes : Reality exists independently of human representations . This view , called realism . is that though we have mental and linguistic representations of the innovation in the form of beliefs , experiences , statements , and theories there is a population come to the fore there that is representations ADDIN EN .CITE SearleJohn R . SearleRationality and naive realism : What Is at stake ?DaedalusDaedalus3 (Searle , 1993 ,. 60 . Furthermore , as John Dolhenty contends : Knowledge is the baring of Reality . It is not a construct of our mind . The stripping of Reality is initially made by our external sense organs and then more dead by our agreement ADDIN EN .CITE Dolhenty5543John DolhentyA BRIEF ON THE never-ending PHILOSOPHYAugust...If you want to pound a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

I! f you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper