'Correct method for making ‘process’ plural'

'\nSometimes the Grammar unspoiled way of doing more or lessthing looks wrong. such(prenominal) is the case with the plural form for the word process. \n\n make the word plural involves simply adding an es to get processes, as in The Los Angeles-based maker tried several(prenominal) different processes in the lead settling on one unmarried method of production. \n\nProcesses credibly looks wrong because some people mis say it, saying processeze, nevertheless as they would pronounce the end of neuroses, which is the plural of neurosis. Who potty load them? After all, processes is authentically hard to enrolment off the tongue. \n\n scarce process is non of Greek etymology, as is the word neurosis, so that method of pronouncing es as eze does not apply.\n\nNeed an editor program? Having your book, business enter or schoolman paper proofread or redact before submitting it can prove invaluable. In an economic mode where you face knockout competition, your writing call for a uphold eye to hallow you the edge. Whether you come from a big city same(p) Madison, Wisconsin, or a exquisite town like Possum Grape, Arkansas, I can post that second eye.'